Former Clinton campaign aide says rigged election claim is “overstating” things
Zerlina Maxwell, formerly the director of progressive media for Hillary Clinton’s campaign, said on Friday the claim in former Democratic National Committee chair Donna Brazile’s new book that the election was rigged for Clinton is “overstating” how joint fundraising committees work.
In excerpts from her upcoming book featured in Politico Thursday, Brazile claimed the DNC and Clinton came to an unethical agreement to stabilize the party’s finances. In “Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the White House,” Brazile claims the election was unfair because Clinton’s campaign was financing the party from the beginning days of the election, giving it a preferred status with the DNC.
Donna Brazile bashes Clinton campaign in new book
But calling the election rigged against Sen. Bernie Sanders is “overstating” the more “nuanced” way of how the joint fundraising situation worked, Maxwell said in an interview with CBSN. Maxwell said the agreements in 2015 and 2016 are “not new information,” as Politico had already reported on them. She also said “re-litigating” a primary is not helpful to the democratic party as it looks to the future.
“I do not think that re-litigating a primary, which is so contentious but not ultimately close in terms of the vote count, that’s just looking backwards when we need to be looking forward,” Maxwell told CBSN.
But Maxwell agreed with Brazile that the DNC’s finances were heading into the 2016 election cycle.
“They’re Democratic Party was broke,” Maxwell said. “They do not have the capacity to rig 50 elections against Bernie Sanders.”
During Obama’s former tenure in the White House, financial resources were “siphoned away” toward Organizing for America, Brazile said, and the DNC “languished” under Obama.
“Yes, they were broke, when Hillary showed up in 2015 to start her campaign for presidency, so yes, she paid off their debt,” Maxwell said, which through the joint fundraising agreement, more Democrats to raise more than $ 500 million.
The joint fundraising agreements allow Democrats to raise more than $ 500 million, Maxwell said. But, Maxwell said, more transparency is needed around joint fundraising agreements. Maxwell called the joint fundraising agreements “somewhat of a loophole,” because people can donate a much greater amount of the maximum contribution to the DNC, versus a candidate directly.
“I think there should be transparency in how these things are done,” she said.
The DNC did not directly refute many of Brazil’s CBS News received Friday morning claims in a statement.
“DNC Communications Director Xochitl Hinojosa said in a statement.” DNC Communications Director Xochitl Hinojosa said in a statement. “Joint fundraising committees were created between DNC and both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders in attempt to raise the general election funds needed to win in 2016. Clinton was the only candidate who raised money for the party through her joint fundraising committee with the DNC, which would benefit any candidate coming out of the presidential primary process. ”
“Under the new leadership, the DNC has signed a joint fundraising agreement with all 50 states and DCs ahead of its presidential prime in order to support our state parties and win at the state, local and national level in 2017, 2018 and beyond , “the statement continued. “This is unprecedented We are a party that elects Democrats every year and in every single zip code.”
Jeff Weaver, former Sanders campaign manager, said it was clear on the campaign there was a pattern of Clinton’s favor, in everything from the debate schedule to the lack of voter data access. Weaver complimented Brazile for her “courage” in writing the book.
“It was not surprising that the DNC was acting in favor of Clinton’s Secretary,” Weaver told CBSN. “I mean, what is surprising, obviously, is that there is a signed document detailing that the Clinton campaign would have control over the DNC, certainly.”